Yep...Pretty Self Explanatory. Here is the notorious Karl Rove, chief advisor to Mr. Bush, rapping at the Radio-Television Correspondents dinner. There is a small intro to this video, which is also pretty funny. Enjoy!
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Sheryl Crow Arrives at UMD for Global Warming Benefit Concert

Set the date on your calendar: April 21 at Cole Field House for a free concern featuring Sheryl Crow, Larry David's wife, scenes from Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth, and a comedy variety show. According to today's Diamondback, Crow will arrive in College Park as part of a College tour to bring awareness to Global Climate Change issues. It would be nice if we all attended as a group, more information on coordinating that will follow.
Click Here to read about the concert
Labels:
Al Gore,
An Inconvenient Truth,
Global Warming
Republicans Still Don't "Get" Global Warming
Former Republican Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee believes that Global Warming is a partisan lie. In response to former Vice President and environmentalist Al Gore's request to hold a concert to promote Global Warming Awareness on the Steps of the United States Capitol. “There has never been a partisan political event at the Capitol, and this is a partisan political event,” said Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK).

It is incredible that the Republican Party still has not seen the writing on the wall with the drastic changes in our environment and repeatedly denies their existence. To sweep this issue under the rug as partisan is unfair. One thing that is so promising, and scary, about Global Warming is that it inherently involves world cooperation because air does not limit itself to recognized borders. Science has proven Global Warming's detrimental effect to our climate, and exchanging majority documented evidence for partisan bickering is only an excuse for the Republicans to appease their buddies in "big oil".
Even in bipartisan efforts, the Republicans are unwilling to compromise. All this issue is is a way to have partisan leverage over our Democratic party rather than do something that can help out county, and in my eyes, that is wrong.
To Read More about these recent events click here

It is incredible that the Republican Party still has not seen the writing on the wall with the drastic changes in our environment and repeatedly denies their existence. To sweep this issue under the rug as partisan is unfair. One thing that is so promising, and scary, about Global Warming is that it inherently involves world cooperation because air does not limit itself to recognized borders. Science has proven Global Warming's detrimental effect to our climate, and exchanging majority documented evidence for partisan bickering is only an excuse for the Republicans to appease their buddies in "big oil".
Even in bipartisan efforts, the Republicans are unwilling to compromise. All this issue is is a way to have partisan leverage over our Democratic party rather than do something that can help out county, and in my eyes, that is wrong.
To Read More about these recent events click here
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Democratic Success: War Resolution Passes the Senate
The Democratically controlled Senate has passed legislation detailing a fixed timetable for an American troop withdrawal from Iraq. Certainly, this measure will be vetoed by Mr. Bush, only to be his second veto ever as President. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) held a press conference today to applaud the Democratic efforts on the legislation.
The timetable moves U.S. troops out of Iraq by March 2008. The Democrats now are demanding that Bush listen to the American people and set up a viable plan for our troops withdrawal from Iraq.
The House of Representatives passed a similar message earlier this session, under Speaker Nancy Pelosi, establishing a timetable of a troop withdrawal by September 1, 2008.
The measure was summed up well by College Park's representative, the Majority Leader Steny Hoyer , "Frankly, I'd think we'd like to reach out to the president and say...'Mr. President, this is not a unilateral government. It is a separation of powers, and the Congress of the United States is assuming review."
Click here to read more about today's important vote
The timetable moves U.S. troops out of Iraq by March 2008. The Democrats now are demanding that Bush listen to the American people and set up a viable plan for our troops withdrawal from Iraq.

The House of Representatives passed a similar message earlier this session, under Speaker Nancy Pelosi, establishing a timetable of a troop withdrawal by September 1, 2008.
The measure was summed up well by College Park's representative, the Majority Leader Steny Hoyer , "Frankly, I'd think we'd like to reach out to the president and say...'Mr. President, this is not a unilateral government. It is a separation of powers, and the Congress of the United States is assuming review."
Click here to read more about today's important vote
Op-Ed: Bush Welcoming Constitutional Crisis
According to Washington Post columnist E.J Dionee Jr, the stalemate between President Bush and the Democratically controlled Congress could turn into something more than a power grab or fundamental argument. The Iraq war has caused so much unrest in the country, which President Bush has ignored, that it could do more than divide our government and break the fabric of our Constitution.

Dionee wrote, "Bush might still win this Senate vote and a reprieve for his war policy. But the president's refusal to acknowledge that the country has fundamentally changed its mind on the war makes it impossible for him to work with Congress on a sensible approach to a withdrawal that will happen some day -- with or without a constitutional showdown."
Dionee is spot on here. Mr. Bush has constantly and repeatedly been unwilling to compromise on any issue, especially the war, in which a vast majority of the country disagrees with him. Again the Bush administration proves that they are more about power than policy, more about the party than the people, and more about politics than about popular freedoms. It is a painful reality for our beloved country, but more and more becoming a sad reality that our President is ignoring the Constitution and turning members of his own party against his ideas.
To read the op-ed Click here

Dionee wrote, "Bush might still win this Senate vote and a reprieve for his war policy. But the president's refusal to acknowledge that the country has fundamentally changed its mind on the war makes it impossible for him to work with Congress on a sensible approach to a withdrawal that will happen some day -- with or without a constitutional showdown."
Dionee is spot on here. Mr. Bush has constantly and repeatedly been unwilling to compromise on any issue, especially the war, in which a vast majority of the country disagrees with him. Again the Bush administration proves that they are more about power than policy, more about the party than the people, and more about politics than about popular freedoms. It is a painful reality for our beloved country, but more and more becoming a sad reality that our President is ignoring the Constitution and turning members of his own party against his ideas.
To read the op-ed Click here
Monday, March 26, 2007
Edwards Interview With Katie Couric
The Edwards' appeared in an interview for the first time since Elizabeth Edwards announced that her cancer had reappeared in a late stage. John Edwards announced that he would continue to run for President in 2008. Below is a link to an excerpt from the interview. Enjoy!
Click Here to view the excerpt on youtube
To read more about the interview click here
Click Here to view the excerpt on youtube
To read more about the interview click here
Labels:
2008 Election,
Elizabeth Edwards,
John Edwards
Thursday, March 22, 2007
LAME PROTEST ALERT

The Hill, the traditionally conservative newspaper on Capitol Hill, is reporting that CodePink will be staging a protest of the Iraq War in Speaker Nancy Pelosi's personal office in the Cannon building at 4:00pm.
There are two things so blatently stupid about this particular protest: 1) I believe that Speaker Pelosi supports their cause, so can this really be classified as a protest, or just an afternoon with a friend? 2) Wouldn't you want to maybe lobby someone rather than squat in their office? All this is to me is a black-eye to the anti-war community. Actions like these reflect negatively on these organizations in the eyes of Congress and the American people. Congress should be a place of compromise and intelligent discussion, rather than a sit in protest just asking to be arrested in a sympathetic office. Let's end this war better than the way King George started it. Let's do it with truth and fact rather than stupid pressure to friendly faces.
This organizations have some decent causes, but the way they express themselves borders on insanity. They frequently use people associated with their cause, like Cindy Sheehan, and turn them into martyrs for a cause to get attention for themselves. Isn't that just as bad as some of the games the Republicans play. Please...
Click here to read the developing story in The Hill newspaper
Labels:
Code Pink,
George W. Bush,
Iraq,
Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Republicans: Global Warming is a Farce Just Like that Hole in the Ozone Layer
Al Gore testified on Capitol Hill yesterday about Global warming in front of a joint House committee meeting. Gore visited the hill for the first time since attending the Presidential inauguration in January of 2001. He testified that Global Warming was a "fever" and the world needed to listen to the doctor. House republicans faced off with Gore sa
ying that Global Climate change was unproven and under a lot of disagreement.
"The planet has a fever," Gore said. "If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor. If the Doctor says you need to intervene here, you don't say, 'Well, I read a science fiction novel that told me it's not a problem.' If the crib's on fire, you don't speculate that the baby is flame retardant. You take action."
Well said. Gore should be testifying later on the Senate side.
To read more about Gore's visit click here
ying that Global Climate change was unproven and under a lot of disagreement."The planet has a fever," Gore said. "If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor. If the Doctor says you need to intervene here, you don't say, 'Well, I read a science fiction novel that told me it's not a problem.' If the crib's on fire, you don't speculate that the baby is flame retardant. You take action."
Well said. Gore should be testifying later on the Senate side.
To read more about Gore's visit click here
Top Bush Aids Issued Subpoenas

Justice? Probably not. But on a high note of democracy after another week of monarchy from the King Bush regime, the Senate voted to realize their ability to issue subpoenas to Karl Rove and other top Bushies for their latest scandal on the US Attorney firings (just for argument sake, the other monarchical Bushism this week was how he can reach scandal after scandal, use the Congress as a rubber stamp for 6 years, and treat the present one as "micromanagers", Bush refuses to give anyone else power including the non-represented citizens of DC). The Senate Judiciary community will hold a hearing on the recent firings, I guess, when they get to it. They didn't actually subpoena any of the administration members, which would make sense. President Bush is staunchly against having them testify because basically, if you hadn't figured it out" the whole things makes him look terrible (which is so damn good at anyway). Isn't it time for the Democrats to stop trying to out-politic the Republicans? I don't think that will work. It is time to hold hearings for these guys and either get some answers or just to air Bush's dirty laundry in public. Let's get with the program already!
To read more about the senate "action" click here
Labels:
George W. Bush,
Karl Rove,
US Attorneys,
US Senate
Kind Wishes for Elizabeth Edwards

This morning, the politico blog was reporting that John Edwards would be suspending his campaign to care for his wife, who recently found out that the cancer she suffered in 2004 had resurfaced. At noon today though, Edwards announced that his campaign is going strong and that he will continue to actively campaign to seek the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.
It is important to take this opportunity to send our organizations best wishes to Elizabeth Edwards on a speedy recovery from her illness. I feel that support for a candidate aside, the Edwards family is going to be around for a while in our party and we hope that Elizabeth can be included in that.
So lesson for the wise: Edwards is still running, and the politico got it wrong.
Click Here to read how the politico screwed this one up
Click here to read more about the Edwards announcement
Labels:
2008 Election,
Elizabeth Edwards,
John Edwards
Sunday, March 18, 2007
Go Away, Bob Ehrlich!
It appears that Republican Bob Ehrlich's loss to Governor O'Malley in November hasn't deterred him from showing his face and making his voice heard in Maryland. Actually, quite literally that's what he is doing. Bob Ehrlich plans to host a radio show with his wife, Kendel, on a conservative local Maryland station. His show will be largely discussing family matters and presidential politics.

I don't think anybody is fooled by Ehrlich's attempt to remain in the spotlight for his own political gain and attention leading up to some key races in 2010, including those for the Governors office (Challenging Martin O'Malley) or the U.S. Senate (Challenging long-time legend in the Senate Barbara A. Mikulski). It is highly unusual for a so recently-trounced elected official to return to the spotlight so quickly, making us suspicious to Ehrlich's actions.
The radio show is on WBAL (1090 AM) on Saturday mornings. When Governor, Ehrlich usually felt comfortable fielding questions on the air from a largely conservative listenership. Feel free to call in to ask Ehrlich some questions of your own at 1-800-757-9225 when he is on the air (please be polite if you decide to call in, nothing is solved by rudeness).
Click Here to read a Washington Post article about Ehrlich's new show

I don't think anybody is fooled by Ehrlich's attempt to remain in the spotlight for his own political gain and attention leading up to some key races in 2010, including those for the Governors office (Challenging Martin O'Malley) or the U.S. Senate (Challenging long-time legend in the Senate Barbara A. Mikulski). It is highly unusual for a so recently-trounced elected official to return to the spotlight so quickly, making us suspicious to Ehrlich's actions.
The radio show is on WBAL (1090 AM) on Saturday mornings. When Governor, Ehrlich usually felt comfortable fielding questions on the air from a largely conservative listenership. Feel free to call in to ask Ehrlich some questions of your own at 1-800-757-9225 when he is on the air (please be polite if you decide to call in, nothing is solved by rudeness).
Click Here to read a Washington Post article about Ehrlich's new show
Friday, March 16, 2007
Karl Rove in the Middle of More Dirty Business
ABC news is reporting that Karl Rove is in the middle of yet another scandal in the Bush White House. Karl Rove got away relatively unscaved by the Valerie Plame leak scandal, b
ut he may not get away from this one. Recent controversy over the firing of several US Attorneys and leading Democrats calling for the removal of the new US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Several US Attorneys were fired and they largely had one thing in common, differing party and issue affiliation from the Bush Administration. ABC news has recovered e-mails that reflect how the firings were discussed before the Gonzales appointment, with Karl Rove as the middle man in the decision.
As a precedent, is the Bush administration allowed to act in this manner, despite his current "lame duck status". This has just been the ongoing of a series of controversies and scandals involving to Bush administration aids and officials. How can accountability be held on these issues without wasting valuable congressional time? We look forward to reading your comments.
Click here to read more about the ABC News report
ut he may not get away from this one. Recent controversy over the firing of several US Attorneys and leading Democrats calling for the removal of the new US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Several US Attorneys were fired and they largely had one thing in common, differing party and issue affiliation from the Bush Administration. ABC news has recovered e-mails that reflect how the firings were discussed before the Gonzales appointment, with Karl Rove as the middle man in the decision.As a precedent, is the Bush administration allowed to act in this manner, despite his current "lame duck status". This has just been the ongoing of a series of controversies and scandals involving to Bush administration aids and officials. How can accountability be held on these issues without wasting valuable congressional time? We look forward to reading your comments.
Click here to read more about the ABC News report
Same Story, New Chapter
At a House Republican dinner party event last night, President Bush committed to a Republican resurgence in 2008, to take back both houses of Congress and insure recovery of the White House. Although a typical Republican fundraiser, where many things are said to energize the party, one thing really stood out. What was clear was the President's commitment to Iraq, adding that the Democrats in congress are trying to "micromanage" the war, and speaking about the importance of privatizing social security.

The President has shown not commitment, but stubbornness to any issues he disagrees with. Mr. Bush refuses time and again to acknowledge opposition or work with the Democrats in Congress. Bush ignores popular demand about the war and has not even "gotten over" his social security failure, which wasn't even backed by his own party. President Bush needs to understand that even if the Republicans take back all three branches and return to the totalitarianism associated with one party rule, the President has no option but to work with the Democrats in congress, or risk not accomplishing anything positive for our country.
Click here to read more about Bush's remarks

The President has shown not commitment, but stubbornness to any issues he disagrees with. Mr. Bush refuses time and again to acknowledge opposition or work with the Democrats in Congress. Bush ignores popular demand about the war and has not even "gotten over" his social security failure, which wasn't even backed by his own party. President Bush needs to understand that even if the Republicans take back all three branches and return to the totalitarianism associated with one party rule, the President has no option but to work with the Democrats in congress, or risk not accomplishing anything positive for our country.
Click here to read more about Bush's remarks
One Step Closer to DC Voting Rights

An important milestone was reached yesterday, the passage of the DC Voting Rights bill in the House Judiciary Committee. The bill is expected to head to the House floor next week. The bill would grant voting rights to the District of Columbia on the House floor. The District currently has a vote in House committees but not on the floor of the House. This legislation would give DC, a highly populated area, full representation in the House of Representatives. The bill would also stipulate that a new district be created (to maintain a party balance) in Utah, making the total number of Representatives 437 rather than 435. The District will still be without a vote in the US Senate.
The bill is likely to pass the House floor next week, but is understood to reach a difficult time in the Senate. Support is questionable because current members of congress have voted for this bill largely along party lines. The Democrats in the Senate will not be able to call a vote for the bill without consent from the Republican members. Supporters of the bill are optimistic that the two Senators from Utah, Senators Hatch and Bennett, will rally Republican support for the bill because their state would too pick up a representative.
Still, yesterday's vote should not be overlooked as an important step. DC voting rights have become a priority in this Congress and has good chances of finally giving the residents of the District the rights they are entitled to by the Constitution.
Click to read an article about yesterday's milestone
Monday, March 12, 2007
Walter Reed Shame
The scandal at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, which was uncovered by the Washington Post, has sent ripples through the Department of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the White House. Today's latest is the Army Surgeon General submitting his resignation from his position. Lt. Col. Kevin C. Kiley resigned from his position today after intense media and public scrutiny of his actions.
After putting an abundance of political stress on the Democrats in Congress for allegedly being against funding our troops, the stress is now on the president who is feeling the heat from the public. After an emphasis on caring for our troops when in battle, the current administration never bothered to take care of soldiers after they return from battle in service to our country in a farce of a war. The Washington Post, over the course of the past several weeks, have uncovered the harsh conditions in which the soldiers live when they are revived from the pain of war.
Is this latest resignation another case of someone else taking the fall for members of the Bush administration? Who knows at this point how much this President knew about what was going on at Walter Reed. All we know is that our troops must be cared for, and the administration can no longer wiggle their way out of hypocrisy with political opposition games. It is time for them to be held accountable for their lies.
Click Here to Read the Washington Post Article
After putting an abundance of political stress on the Democrats in Congress for allegedly being against funding our troops, the stress is now on the president who is feeling the heat from the public. After an emphasis on caring for our troops when in battle, the current administration never bothered to take care of soldiers after they return from battle in service to our country in a farce of a war. The Washington Post, over the course of the past several weeks, have uncovered the harsh conditions in which the soldiers live when they are revived from the pain of war.
Is this latest resignation another case of someone else taking the fall for members of the Bush administration? Who knows at this point how much this President knew about what was going on at Walter Reed. All we know is that our troops must be cared for, and the administration can no longer wiggle their way out of hypocrisy with political opposition games. It is time for them to be held accountable for their lies.
Click Here to Read the Washington Post Article
Labels:
George W. Bush,
Walter Reed,
War on Terror,
Washington Post
Thursday, March 8, 2007
"Global Warming is not Coming; It Is Here"
Despite opposing documentaries trying to raise counters to the existence of global warming, its affects are apparent, and instead of bickering we need to become more environmentally friendly as a country and a society. Global Climate Warming has the potential of displacing millions of people and making Earth almost uninhabitable. It is an issue that crosses boarders, is not solvable by military force, and demands a united effort. This issue isn't even limited to scientific and political action: it has also grabbed the attention of the sporting world.Sports Illustrated, in their March 12, 2007 issue, has a cover story about the cots of global warming to the sporting world. The environmental crisis has made hot August days very difficult for football training camp, Hurricane Katrina leveled the home of the New Orleans Saints, and world class skiers are having their competitions cancelled due to a lack of snow. The sporting world has now taken its first "green" step. Sports Illustrated has suggested being pro-active, and building more environmentally friendly stadiums. They hired SmithGroup, and architectural firm, to design a carbon-neutral stadium, powered by wind. The article also highlighted actions already being taken by almost all professional sports to be more eco-friendly and responsible about fossil-fuel emissions.
Why on an issue that is so dire to this world is our government unable to be proactive, let alone respond to a crisis that is it has allowed to reach that point. The article highlights how "Global Warming is not coming; it is here" by explaining how Earth has the potential to rise in temperature by 5 degrees by 2010, a very dangerous level. It seems that the Bush administration can be proactive and preemptive with every issue that does not involved consensus, diplomacy, and most importantly, need. It is time to apply the Bush Doctrine to real crises that need preemption to avoid a life-threatening problem. Instead, the administration was even reluctant to recognize the threat, let alone act on it. We can drag our feel no longer on this issue. Please e-mail sga@umddemocrats.edu if you would like to get involved with the College Democrats "The Globe Starts Here" initiative to make the University of Maryland a pioneer in fighting global warming.
Click Here to read the Article in Sports Illustrated
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Libby: The Fall Guy for Cheney
As many of you already know, "Scooter" Libby was found guilty
yesterday on four of the five charges against him including perjury and obstruction of justice in connecting with the Valerie Plame CIA leak. The case itself is obvious scandal for the administration in which connection to the case leads certainly to Cheney and speculated high enough to Bush. The case is an important indicator of the way the Republican business is run: Power at all costs. Not only is this idea wholeheartedly UnAmerican, where checks and balances help allow separation of power, but an indicator of priorities. The Bush administration made the war in Iraq such a priority to the success of the administration that they would go so far as out-ing a CIA agent to keep people in the dark on the Iraq war. The Bush administration's priority is power in the place of governance and has developed into a monarchical bureaucracy, more than our country has ever seen. This case has become all to clear in the past months that Libby, Cheney's former Chief of Staff, is taking the fall for his former boss, who had a strong hand in orchestrating this "leak". Cheney is one of the most powerful Vice Presidents in history, another Bush administration trend. Cheney was able to orchestrate the war and protecting it in the press quietly from the VP seat, while Bush stayed an innocent figure-head. The same can be said in the House of Reps. Dennis Hastert was a quiet congressman with a clear record, who could be in the spotlight as Speaker, while Tom Delay orchestrated Republican power grabs in redistricting, rules, etc, from the guise of the largely overlooked majority leader position. Our country needs to return to its principles of governance over power, and a new party must enter the executive branch to clean up the influenza of back door negotiation and willingness to go through all odds to never admit a mistake and secure a stranglehold on power.
To Read More about Cheney's Role, Click Here
yesterday on four of the five charges against him including perjury and obstruction of justice in connecting with the Valerie Plame CIA leak. The case itself is obvious scandal for the administration in which connection to the case leads certainly to Cheney and speculated high enough to Bush. The case is an important indicator of the way the Republican business is run: Power at all costs. Not only is this idea wholeheartedly UnAmerican, where checks and balances help allow separation of power, but an indicator of priorities. The Bush administration made the war in Iraq such a priority to the success of the administration that they would go so far as out-ing a CIA agent to keep people in the dark on the Iraq war. The Bush administration's priority is power in the place of governance and has developed into a monarchical bureaucracy, more than our country has ever seen. This case has become all to clear in the past months that Libby, Cheney's former Chief of Staff, is taking the fall for his former boss, who had a strong hand in orchestrating this "leak". Cheney is one of the most powerful Vice Presidents in history, another Bush administration trend. Cheney was able to orchestrate the war and protecting it in the press quietly from the VP seat, while Bush stayed an innocent figure-head. The same can be said in the House of Reps. Dennis Hastert was a quiet congressman with a clear record, who could be in the spotlight as Speaker, while Tom Delay orchestrated Republican power grabs in redistricting, rules, etc, from the guise of the largely overlooked majority leader position. Our country needs to return to its principles of governance over power, and a new party must enter the executive branch to clean up the influenza of back door negotiation and willingness to go through all odds to never admit a mistake and secure a stranglehold on power.To Read More about Cheney's Role, Click Here
Labels:
Dick Cheney,
guilty,
Iraq,
Republicans,
Scooter Libby
Monday, March 5, 2007
SURVEY SAYS: Bush Bad for Israel
Once again dispelling the myth that Bush's foreign policy is "better for Israel" is an obvious yet harshly upsetting task. Today, the BBC released a worldwide survey ranking Israel, Iran, and the United States as having the worst images worldwide. Israel had the highest negative response, followed by Iran and then the U.S. Maryland professor Steven Kull conducted the research along with the pollster GlobeScan and said of the survey, "It appears that people around the world tend to look negatively on countries whose profile is marked by the pursuit of power mili
tarily."
Military pursuit of power is a strong characteristic of the Bush doctrine, which has lumped itself together with our strongest Ally Israel. Now, world perception has seen fit to include peaceful just countries, such as the U.S. and Israel together with a harsh dictatorial state in Iran. Bush's inability to seek diplomatic solutions and trump the world is going to come back to haunt our country when we rally support for a real threat in the world. Iraq, unfortunately, could be the final example of free-country faith and support for the United States when called upon due to a lack of trust. This survey reveals what democrats have been saying for the entire administrative history under George W. Bush; you cannot drive up support with polarization. And in this case it is not only hurting us, but our Israeli friends who indeed do seek diplomatic solutions as opposed to force in their conflicts.
Democrats, on the other hand, have come out again in support of Israel this week, making them the better favorite for U.S. leadership. At AIPAC's Chicago policy forum, Senator Barack Obama reiterated his strong support for the U.S.-Israel relationship. He said, "Our job is to never forget that the threat of violence is real. Our job is to renew the United States’ efforts to help Israel achieve peace with its neighbors while remaining vigilant against those who do not share this vision. Our job is to do more than lay out another road map; our job is to rebuild the road to real peace and lasting security throughout the region."
It is time to reform U.S. and also the United States' strongest allies images, and the first step is to utilize diplomacy.
This is not an endorsement of Barack Obama for President.
Click Here to read more about the survey
tarily."Military pursuit of power is a strong characteristic of the Bush doctrine, which has lumped itself together with our strongest Ally Israel. Now, world perception has seen fit to include peaceful just countries, such as the U.S. and Israel together with a harsh dictatorial state in Iran. Bush's inability to seek diplomatic solutions and trump the world is going to come back to haunt our country when we rally support for a real threat in the world. Iraq, unfortunately, could be the final example of free-country faith and support for the United States when called upon due to a lack of trust. This survey reveals what democrats have been saying for the entire administrative history under George W. Bush; you cannot drive up support with polarization. And in this case it is not only hurting us, but our Israeli friends who indeed do seek diplomatic solutions as opposed to force in their conflicts.
Democrats, on the other hand, have come out again in support of Israel this week, making them the better favorite for U.S. leadership. At AIPAC's Chicago policy forum, Senator Barack Obama reiterated his strong support for the U.S.-Israel relationship. He said, "Our job is to never forget that the threat of violence is real. Our job is to renew the United States’ efforts to help Israel achieve peace with its neighbors while remaining vigilant against those who do not share this vision. Our job is to do more than lay out another road map; our job is to rebuild the road to real peace and lasting security throughout the region."
It is time to reform U.S. and also the United States' strongest allies images, and the first step is to utilize diplomacy.
This is not an endorsement of Barack Obama for President.
Click Here to read more about the survey
Labels:
AIPAC,
Barack Obama,
BBC,
Bush Doctrine,
George W. Bush,
Iran,
Israel,
Steven Kull,
United States
Saturday, March 3, 2007
Does Anyone Like Anne Coulter?
No. And her latest stupidity comes again when she avoids the issues and spews unrelated craziness rather than presenting viable ideas. At the Conservative Political Action Conference, Anne Coulter called Democratic Presidential candidate John Edwards a "faggot". Yep, I am just as shocked as you are at the latest schlock that comes out of Coulter's dirty mouth. If you're still in disbelief, click to watch the video.
She said, "I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word "faggot," so I — so kind of an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards."
The College Democrats join DNC chairman Howard Dean in condemning Coulter's remarks as "hate-filled and bigoted". This is just another example of a largely hailed Neo-Conservative figure head avoiding the issues to resort to partisan name-calling and low-balling. This stretches throughout the entire Republican Party ranging from the top (George W. Bush and Dick Cheney), to the bottom (Anne Coulter). Let's tackle the issues, not glaze over them with ignorant rhetoric.
This is not an endorsement of John Edwards for President.
She said, "I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word "faggot," so I — so kind of an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards."
The College Democrats join DNC chairman Howard Dean in condemning Coulter's remarks as "hate-filled and bigoted". This is just another example of a largely hailed Neo-Conservative figure head avoiding the issues to resort to partisan name-calling and low-balling. This stretches throughout the entire Republican Party ranging from the top (George W. Bush and Dick Cheney), to the bottom (Anne Coulter). Let's tackle the issues, not glaze over them with ignorant rhetoric.
This is not an endorsement of John Edwards for President.
Labels:
Anne Coulter,
CPAC,
Dick Cheney,
DNC,
George W. Bush,
Howard Dean,
John Edwards,
Neo-Conservative,
Republicans
Friday, March 2, 2007
Democrats Better for Israel in '08
An op-ed in the Jerusalem Post has told many Zionist supporters of Republican candidates to get real and support Democrats. The editorial speaks on falsely hailed Bush foreign policy in terms of keeping Israel secure, and says, "The centerpiece of Bush's foreign policy, his war on terror, has been a disastrous failure. America has not lessened the threat of international terrorism, which has grow
n."
Israel's biggest threat currently, Iran, has also been mismanaged by the Bush administration. Instead of quelling the Iranians with diplomacy, Bush has instead threatened the country and repeatedly labeled Iran as "evil", giving them a bigger voice on the world stage and gaining more and more attention, and getting closer to having nuclear capabilities.
Bush's botching of Iranian policy is also included in the article, "In addition to emboldening Hizbullah and Hamas, America has failed to dissuade Iran from pursuing an aggressive program of nuclear weapons development."
Alternatively, the two Democratic front runners, Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama, have been long time friends and sup
porters of Israel. Senator Clinton has visited Israel on a regular basis since she was first lady, supported Israel constantly in the Senate, and has spoken at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's (AIPAC) annual national meeting. Senator Obama has also been an outspoken supporter of Israel in public speeches and on the floor of the Senate, and visited Israel for the first time in 2006.
Other Democrats in the running have also stressed their support for Israel. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson has a long record of Israel support dating back to his tenure as US ambassador to the United Nations.
The article concludes with a look for the future, and says, "The Bush era of cowboy diplomacy, which has been marked by instability and insecurity, will soon come to an end. A Democratic victory will reverse this trend and will result in increased stability and security for both the United States and Israel."
This post is not an endorsement of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, or Bill Richardson for President. The College Democrats support every Democratic Presidential candidate running for President at this time.
Click Here to Read the Op-Ed
Mark Your Calendars:
The College Democrats and the Pro-Israel Terrapin Alliance (PITA) will be co-hosting an event detailing Democratic support for Israel on March 28th. Details to follow on the College Democrats Website.
n."Israel's biggest threat currently, Iran, has also been mismanaged by the Bush administration. Instead of quelling the Iranians with diplomacy, Bush has instead threatened the country and repeatedly labeled Iran as "evil", giving them a bigger voice on the world stage and gaining more and more attention, and getting closer to having nuclear capabilities.
Bush's botching of Iranian policy is also included in the article, "In addition to emboldening Hizbullah and Hamas, America has failed to dissuade Iran from pursuing an aggressive program of nuclear weapons development."
Alternatively, the two Democratic front runners, Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama, have been long time friends and sup
porters of Israel. Senator Clinton has visited Israel on a regular basis since she was first lady, supported Israel constantly in the Senate, and has spoken at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's (AIPAC) annual national meeting. Senator Obama has also been an outspoken supporter of Israel in public speeches and on the floor of the Senate, and visited Israel for the first time in 2006.Other Democrats in the running have also stressed their support for Israel. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson has a long record of Israel support dating back to his tenure as US ambassador to the United Nations.
The article concludes with a look for the future, and says, "The Bush era of cowboy diplomacy, which has been marked by instability and insecurity, will soon come to an end. A Democratic victory will reverse this trend and will result in increased stability and security for both the United States and Israel."
This post is not an endorsement of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, or Bill Richardson for President. The College Democrats support every Democratic Presidential candidate running for President at this time.
Click Here to Read the Op-Ed
Mark Your Calendars:
The College Democrats and the Pro-Israel Terrapin Alliance (PITA) will be co-hosting an event detailing Democratic support for Israel on March 28th. Details to follow on the College Democrats Website.
Labels:
2008 Election,
Barack Obama,
Bill Richardson,
Democrats,
George W. Bush,
Hillary Clinton,
Iran,
Iraq,
Israel,
Jerusalem Post,
PITA
Thursday, March 1, 2007
Republicans Begging For Money?
Republican failed U.S. Senate candidate Michael Steele today sent out a letter to some of his closest campaign supporters asking for a dear favor. In Steele's loss to Democrat Ben Cardin in November, he appeared to have spent more money than he raised (sound like a microcosm of his party?).
In Steele's letter he writes, "You've always known me to call it as I see it, so I will get straight to the point," St
eele writes. "Steele for Maryland Inc. has just over $205,000 in unpaid bills from my Senate campaign. As hard as it is to write this letter, you're one of the few I can count on to help me raise the dollars I need to pay all of my committee's bills."
"Anyone got $205,000 to help me pay my bills?" Maybe Steele should go to the RNC, instead of begging Marylanders for money, especially after talks of a second go-around at losing to Democrats by hinting at challenging Governor Martin O'Malley for governor in 2010. What I don't understand is, who would ever want to contribute to a candidate who has already lost the election? Wouldn't you just want to give your money to someone who might actually implement what you see as right? It will definitely be interesting to see if he can pay his debt, or if the RNC will pay his debt, or if he just accumulates debt and gets taken away. We shall see. Keep checking in.
To read more about Michael Steele's debt click here
In Steele's letter he writes, "You've always known me to call it as I see it, so I will get straight to the point," St
eele writes. "Steele for Maryland Inc. has just over $205,000 in unpaid bills from my Senate campaign. As hard as it is to write this letter, you're one of the few I can count on to help me raise the dollars I need to pay all of my committee's bills.""Anyone got $205,000 to help me pay my bills?" Maybe Steele should go to the RNC, instead of begging Marylanders for money, especially after talks of a second go-around at losing to Democrats by hinting at challenging Governor Martin O'Malley for governor in 2010. What I don't understand is, who would ever want to contribute to a candidate who has already lost the election? Wouldn't you just want to give your money to someone who might actually implement what you see as right? It will definitely be interesting to see if he can pay his debt, or if the RNC will pay his debt, or if he just accumulates debt and gets taken away. We shall see. Keep checking in.
To read more about Michael Steele's debt click here
Labels:
Campaigns,
Michael Steele,
Money,
Republicans,
Washington Post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)